Skills/ClawHub/living-your-own-answer

living-your-own-answer@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "记录、分析和陪伴成长的长期成长系统。帮助用户通过真实生活经历，逐步建立属于自己的判断力、边界感、创造力和人生答案。当用户谈论人生困惑、成长迷茫、关系问题、自我探索、人生选择、复盘反思、情绪处理、边界建立、责任感培养、创造力发展等话题时调用此Skill。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher web-seeker · publishing for 157 daysInstalls 616Last detonated 14 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 916 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈797 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim web-seeker: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim web-seekerPropose a patch to the maintainer