Skills/ClawHub/literature-reading

literature-reading@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "上传中英文学术论文PDF/文本，自动解析全文，精简生成摘要，精准提取研究问题、核心方法、关键结论、创新点，并输出该论文对用户课题的参考价值。结构化输出学术笔记，可直接用于课题参考与文献整理。Use when the user asks for 文献阅读、论文速读、精读论文、文献摘要、提取研究问题/方法/结论/创新点、整理学术笔记、论文参考价值，或上传学术论文 PDF/截图/文本要求结构化整理。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher cryptocxf · joined 10 days agoInstalls 321Last detonated 1 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 303 lines in 3 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈635 tok
1 file · 3 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cryptocxf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim cryptocxfPropose a patch to the maintainer