linkfox-tsearch-search@1.0.6
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "网络搜索、在线检索、实时信息查询、搜索引擎搜索、Reddit等社区平台讨论、外部站点帖子和热门话题。当用户需要搜索网络上的最新信息、查找近期新闻或趋势、查询实时数据、通过搜索引擎调研话题、浏览Reddit或社区讨论、发现外部站点帖子和热门话题、获取任何在线内容、web search, online lookup, real-time information, news search, Reddit, trending topics, search engine时触发此技能。即使用户未明确说"搜索"，只要其意图涉及获取实时网络信息或核实当前事实，也应触发此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,298 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim linkfox-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.