linkfox-amazon-reviews-list@1.0.10
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "按ASIN获取并分析亚马逊商品评论，支持15个站点(含美国站)，按星级筛选评论。当用户提到亚马逊评论、美国站评论、商品评价、买家投诉、差评、好评、星级评分、评论分析、评论情感、产品改良建议、Vine评论、已验证购买评论、竞品评论研究、Amazon reviews, US reviews, Amazon.com reviews, product feedback, negative review analysis, positive review analysis, star rating filter, review sentiment analysis, product improvement insights, Vine reviews, competitor reviews, customer feedback时触发此技能。即使用户未明确说"评论"，只要其需求涉及读取、筛选或分析亚马逊商品的买家评论，也应触发此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,870 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim linkfox-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.