link-skills@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Link 产品全链路开发技能，覆盖需求分析、方案设计（技术方案/数据库设计/接口设计）、 编码开发（基于 link 标准）、测试部署上线、后续运维的完整生命周期。 适用于工作目录 D:\develop\code\cdfai 下的 link CRM+AI 微服务系统。 当用户需要为 link 项目开发新功能、设计接口、修改代码、排查问题、部署上线或进行运维操作时触发此技能。 关键词：link开发、link接口、link部署、link运维、CRM开发、AI助手开发、知识库开发、企微同步、微服务开发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,336 lines in 15 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ysh2ldd: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.