liblibai-image-generation-editing-alternative@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "使用 Nano Banana Pro 把 LiblibAI、哩布哩布 AI、Liblib、libtv 或模型社区工作流转换为无需复刻 checkpoint、LoRA、采样器和 seed 的可观察视觉任务。Use when users search LiblibAI 替代、哩布哩布平替、libtv alternative、模型社区迁移、LoRA 效果迁移、文生图、图生图、商业图片 API 或国内稳定生图入口；不提供或复制第三方模型文件。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 702 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wubin1836: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.