learning-review@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "学用结合的回顾机制。包含五个回顾环节：学后复盘（每次学完）、周内化（每周一次）、应用检查（每两周一次）、压缩归档（每月一次）、知识落地（每周一次）。将学习成果转化为 Agent 实际工作能力，防止"学完就忘"。 触发词："回顾", "复盘", "内化", "学习回顾", "learning review", "r..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 412 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim mayf3: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.