Skills/ClawHub/lark-contact

lark-contact@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "飞书 / Lark 通讯录,用于按姓名 / 邮箱把员工解析成 open_id,以及按 open_id 反查员工的姓名 / 部门 / 邮箱 / 联系方式。当用户说出某人姓名而下一步需要发消息 / 加群 / 排日程时,先用本 skill 把姓名换成 ID;当输出里出现 open_id 需要展示成姓名给用户看,或用户直..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher gu2003li · publishing for 152 daysInstalls 666Last detonated 30 h ago
$clawhub install lark-contact
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 243 lines in 4 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈380 tok
1 file · 4 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.