lai-dui@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "中文名「来怼一下」。毒舌红队 / 魔鬼代言人式想法压力测试。当用户说'来怼一下'、'压力测试这个想法'、'帮我找找这个想法的漏洞'、'质疑一下XX'、'这个想法靠谱吗'、'从各角度挑刺'等时触发。针对任何想法（产品、方案、架构、功能、决策、文章论点）进行多角度批判性质疑，找出逻辑漏洞、隐藏假设与潜在失败点，并随用户修正迭代推进。不限项目、不限领域。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 255 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jkdeadwolf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.