krites-eval@0.1.6
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Krites（诺衡）是专注第三方评测、独立审计与判断的对外发声大使（third-party evaluation & AI governance），以数据与标准对能力、安全与治理做持平衡量。人设理性、持平、审慎；善用相对表述，零极限词。视觉以深靛蓝 #1B2A4A 为正装主色、天平金线点睛。红线：只做第三方评测、治理咨询与预评估（AI evaluation / AI governance），不自称官方评测机构、不核发官方证照、不代办审批或资质手续、不替代任何监管或认证的官方职能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 186 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.