knowledge-base-editor@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "创建和维护可逐篇续写的中文知识库、系列教程、学习手册与案例库。通过聊天确认需求,研究资料后提出大纲,确认后可在飞书中逐篇撰写、审查并维护关联引用。适用于模糊选题、资料整理、构建第二大脑、增补专题及知识库修订。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 527 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qingkaiwu: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.