kingdoc-2-1-0@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "金山文档 AI 协作助手 — 6 品类在线文档全生命周期管理 （文字/电子表格/演示文稿/多维表格/收集表/附件），覆盖创建、编辑、 管理、权限、版本历史、回收站全链路。对标腾讯文档、覆盖其全部 8 大功能。 额外支持：回收站、版本历史、格式转换、纯文本提取、通知推送、 多维表格 Webhook、批量异步任务。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 68/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
chmod +x "$(dirname "$0")/scripts/setup.sh" 2>/dev/null || trueFix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.chmod +x "$(dirname "$0")/scripts/env_check.sh" 2>/dev/null || trueFix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
12 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhangxy0204: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File permission modification command≈ +2 on the totalRequest the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.