kickbacks@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Kickbacks.ai — an executable guide to earning passive income from AI tool waiting time. Covers 6 use cases: ① Getting Started — ("How to install Kickbacks" "How to earn money with Claude Code" "How does Kickbacks work") ② Understanding the Economics — ("How much can I earn" "How are ads priced" "What is 50% revenue share") ③ Advertiser Tools — ("How to advertise on Kickbacks" "How to bid on the spinner" "How much does an ad cost") ④ Troubleshooting — ("Kickbacks not working" "Extension not showing" "Status bar says incompatible") ⑤ Analytics & Earnings — ("How to check my balance" "How do payouts work" "How many impressions did I get") ⑥ Privacy & Security — ("Is Kickbacks safe" "Does it read my code" "Is it reversible") Trigger when users say: "Kickbacks" "Get paid for waiting" "Claude Code ads" "spinner money" "earn while coding" "Kickbacks.ai" "Discombobulating" "codex ads" "paid spinner" or mention: kickbacks / spinner / Claude Code monetize / Codex passive income / IDE extension." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 498 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jaysonmeng: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.