jp-patent-claims-review@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "日本专利申请文件权利要求书审核工具。用户上传PDF或Word版专利申请文件后，自动按日本特許法（§29、§36等）及JPO审查实务标准，从法律合规性、新颖性/进步性预判、撰写结构、审查实务风险、涉外申请及战略保护六大维度逐项审核权利要求书；维度二强制调用 novelty-check 和 non-obviousness-check skill 执行全球检索，将 MCP 检索结果作为权利稳定性评审依据；最终输出完整 HTML 格式审核报告。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 341 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yuanzhian-patsnap: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.