jewelry-ad-compliance@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "珠宝行业营销文案合规审查。当用户需要审核珠宝或饰品类的宣传文案、商品详情页、直播话术、朋友圈或短视频文案、活动海报文案等是否违反广告法及行业监管规定时使用。自动加载红橙黄三级词库，扫描高危词（如国家级、第一）、中危词（如极致、完美）及珠宝专属风险点（纯度、功效、产地、促销话术等），结合上下文判定是否违规，并输出带三色标注的合规审查报告。触发词包括合规审查、广告法风险、审一下这段文案、珠宝文案合规。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 240 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cullolo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.