jd-interpreter@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "招聘需求智能解读技能。输入任意岗位JD(粘贴/上传/URL),自动进行8维深度解读:JD结构化拆解→显性隐性需求解构→需求权重评分→能力差距自评引导→面试考点预测→学习提升路线图→ATS关键词注入→薪资对标分析,生成交互式HTML可视化解读报告。触发词:JD解读、岗位解读、招聘需求分析、解读JD、这个岗位要什么、..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
print("Usage: python generate_report.py <analysis.json> [output.html]")Fix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.No other findings across 1,302 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.