Skills/ClawHub/invoice-consistency-check-free

invoice-consistency-check-free@1.0.50

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "把票据里能被算出来、指出来证明是错的地方找出来，每条都带原文证据，不需要付款，也不需要注册。 本免费版执行 行内算术、分项加总、税额计算、价税合计、大小写金额一致、抬头主体一致、日期逻辑、重复票检测、占位符与空白残留。触发词包括 票据一致性AI核对、发票核对、报销自查、金额对不上、重复报销、价税合计不对。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher chenqg618 · joined 7 days agoInstalls 696Last detonated 2 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,905 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,380 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chenqg618: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim chenqg618Propose a patch to the maintainer