investment-researcher-digital-employee@2.0.8
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "【模块清单 / 34 Modules】 一、宏观研究（1-7）：宏观日报、宏观周报、宏观数据解读、政策跟踪分析、宏观风险预警、海外宏观联动、大类资产配置 二、固收研究（8-14）：固收日报、固收隔夜简报、固收周报、利率市场回顾、行业信用风险、债务风险分析、转债估值分析 三、行业与公司（15-22）：行业深度分析、行业一页纸分析、行业配置推荐、公司深度分析、公司一页纸分析、公告解读、业绩点评生成、机构调研大纲 四、策略研究（23-29）：全球财经简报、政策快评、策略日报、市场大势风格研判、市场极简复盘、市场情绪监控、估值景气度跟踪 五、量化研究（30-34）：因子跟踪评估、策略速回测、量化日报、量化周报、另类因子挖掘 【使用方式】给出赛道/标的/时间窗口 → 按模块输出研究报告骨架 → 标注数据来源与口径 → 经人工复核后使用。 【研究口径】本技能内置数据源优先级与降级路径、常用口径速查、输出质量自检、保存/外发前确认四项通用要求（2026-09-21 新增）。 【边界】本技能仅提供研究方法论与报告框架，不构成投资建议；数据由用户在自有授权的数据服务中获取，所有输出须经具备资质的专业人员复核。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,568 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gechengling: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.