investment-framework-skill@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "[何时使用]当用户需要进行投资价值分析时;当用户询问"这家公司值得投资吗"时;当用户需要资产配置建议时;当用户想做投资决策但需要检查逻辑时;当用户想识别长期趋势和机会时;当用户需要评估市场经济专利时;当需要行业专用指标分析时" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.proc_result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=15)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.proc_result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=15)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.proc_result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.proc_result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=10)Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗?(`chmod +x`) |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.| 运行失败 | 脚本有执行权限吗? | `chmod +x scripts/*.py` |Fix: Request the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim lj22503: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File permission modification command≈ +2 on the totalRequest the narrowest permission that works; replace wildcards with the exact paths or hosts.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.