Skills/ClawHub/internalize-me

internalize-me@1.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Analyze an open-source project against an AI/Agent-engineer job-market competency framework so the user can learn from real code. Use when the user asks to "analyze this project", "帮我分析这个开源项目", "看看这个项目练什么能力", "internalize this project", or wants to turn a repo into a learning plan aligned with AI Ag" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoyta · publishing for 133 daysInstalls 455Last detonated 2d ago
$clawhub install internalize-me
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 268 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,787 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.