interaction-design-sop@0.1.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "Frontend interaction resilience & defense SOP for engineering implementation. Covers 7-step pre-coding interaction checklist: user intent & task friction reduction, P0/P1/P2 information hierarchy triage, 4-state resilience (empty, loading, error, destructive confirmation), perceived performance (optimistic UI, skeletons), power user shortcuts, and layout resilience trade-offs. Use when: implementing UI views/forms/dashboards in code, designing component interaction logic, handling edge cases and states, or conducting frontend UX resilience reviews. Keywords: 交互细节, 状态设计, 边界情况, 异常处理, 交互审查, 骨架屏, 乐观更新, 防错设计, interaction design, edge cases, error state, empty state, loading state, UI review, UI resilience." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 261 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.