Skills/ClawHub/insurance-claim-appeal

insurance-claim-appeal@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "保险理赔纠纷维权辅助分析。当保险顾问的客户被保险公司拒赔时使用。逐条拆解拒赔理由、匹配保险法依据、规划维权路径,生成申诉函/投诉书/证据清单。 涵盖健康险(医疗险/重疾险)六大拒赔场景:未如实告知、等待期出险、既往症、免责条款、疾病定义争议、其他争议。 定位为保险专业咨询辅助工具,非法律执业服务。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher baozhiyin · publishing for 97 daysInstalls 512Last detonated 5d ago
$clawhub install insurance-claim-appeal
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 921 lines in 10 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈700 tok
1 file · 10 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

insurance-claim-appeal@1.0.0 safety verdict: Verified (install only) — KillerSkills