innovation-radar@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "研发创新点雷达：从研发周报、会议纪要、技术方案、实验记录等材料中， 自动发现潜在创新点，并给出保护建议、价值评分（新颖性潜力×技术完整度） 和后续补充问题。 触发场景： - 用户提交研发周报/项目进展，询问"有没有值得保护的创新点" - 用户粘贴会议纪要，询问"这次会议有哪些技术变化点" - 用户上传技术方案/架构文档，询问"哪些部分可以申请专利" - 用户直接描述一个技术改进，询问"这个算不算创新" - 关键词触发：创新点、专利点、可以申请专利吗、值得保护吗、技术交底" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,772 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim yuanzhian-patsnap: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.