Skills/ClawHub/influence-and-negotiation

influence-and-negotiation@1.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Influence and negotiation toolkit for any interaction requiring another person's agreement, even when not framed as 'negotiation'. Covers: B2B sales, salary review, collective bargaining/unions, hard 1:1s, decision announcements, mediation, cross-cultural deals, recruitment, reaching out to a manager, CFO, customer, vendor, or colleague, responding to feedback, headcount requests, declining, pushing back on scope, justifying a delay, explaining a decision, raising a concern, getting alignment. Apply when preparing, live, or drafting any diplomatic message. Triggers: coaching prompts ('they just said X', 'what do I say', 'draft a reply'); counterparty cues (buyer, customer, champion, procurement, RFP, sponsor, HR, union, CHRO, ExCo, candidate, counter-offer, partner, peer); situation cues (pushback, refusal, ghosted, no-decision, escalation, fixed budget, MFN, raise, comp band, strike, layoff, recadrage, expectation reset, M&A, BATNA, objection, concession, anchor, mirroring)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher samber · publishing for 85 daysInstalls 1,338Last detonated 6d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

HIGH
Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction filesreferences/memory.md:39 · Instructs the agent to modify its persistent memory or instruction files… may be adapted** — if the negotiation is simple, merge files; if it's complex, add domain-specific files. Whatever structure is used, it must be declared in `memory.md` under a `## Structure` section so any agent can discover it. Never re…Fix: Remove the text that addresses the agent rather than the reader; describe behavior, do not instruct.
AST01
LOW
Refusal suppressionevals/evals.json:48 · Refusal suppression — attempting to prevent safety responses · informational: not an instruction file… scope is incomparable; expose the scope gap calmly; don't accuse, don't match, don't refuse to engage.", "assertions": [ { "id": "4.1", "description": "Does …Fix: Put hosts, commands and strings in plain source. Decoding at runtime looks identical to malware and costs points on its own.
AST01

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈7,162 tok
1 file · 14 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim samber: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim samberPropose a patch to the maintainer