imperial-physician@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "用于长期记录、整理、分析用户的全部健康信息、身体状态信息、心理状态信息、 生理变化信息、生活方式信息，以及与健康相关的个人背景信息。 适用于 Apple Watch / HealthKit 数据解读、体检报告解读、医疗记录整理、 慢病管理、亚健康调理、睡眠分析、营养补剂管理、中医养生分析、 长期趋势跟踪与健康决策支持。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 584 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim aiist007: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.