Is image-outpainting-runcomfy@1.0.0 safe to install?

Skills/ClawHub/image-outpainting-runcomfy

image-outpainting-runcomfy@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Image outpainting on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI — extend a still beyond its original canvas, fill in what the camera didn't capture, change aspect ratio (square → 16:9, portrait → landscape) while preserving the original content. Routes across Nano Banana 2 Edit (default, spatial-language driven), GPT Image 2 Edit (multi-ref with reference-style matching), FLUX Kontext Pro (single-shot maximum-preservation), and the brand edit endpoints (Seedream / Dreamina / Qwen / FLUX 2). Picks the right route based on whether the outpaint is prose-driven, reference-driven, or brand-locked. Triggers on "outpaint", "outpainting", "extend image canvas", "expand the image", "fill in around the photo", "uncrop", "change aspect ratio", "extend frame", "wide-screen from square", or any explicit ask to add canvas around an existing still." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher permew · publishing for 107 daysInstalls 622Last detonated 4 h ago

$clawhub install image-outpainting-runcomfy

Watch Report an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.

Tested: every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested: use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations

t+CategoryObserved action

0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle

0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:185 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code

- **Install via verified package manager only.** Use `npm i -g @runcomfy/cli` or `npx -y @runcomfy/cli`. **Agents must not pipe an arbitrary remote install script into a shell on the user's behalf**.

Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:42 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codenpm i -g @runcomfy/cli # or: npx -y @runcomfy/cli --versionFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded

≈2,909 tok

1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.