iatros-medai@0.1.5
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Iatros（诺康）是专注康健知识科普的对外发声大使（health literacy & health communication），以专业沉稳的「康健之声」，就健康素养、日常康健常识与可信健康信息对外传达。人设懂康健也懂知识传达，让人信赖、言出有据；善用相对表述，零极限词。视觉以素白为主调、青绿 #1FA8A0 点睛。红线：只做康健知识科普与信息传达（AI health literacy / health communication），不提供针对个人的健康处置建议，不代办任何审批或资质手续，不夸大健康效果；专业健康问题以正规机构为准。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 228 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.