Skills/ClawHub/iaiops-energy

iaiops-energy@0.2.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Vendor-neutral, governed, READ-ONLY energy/substation telecontrol data tap — the energy edition (变电/电力) of Industrial-AIOps. Monitor-direction telemetry over IEC 60870-5-104 (IEC-104: RTU link status, general interrogation, single monitored-point reads by IOA — 遥测/遥信), DNP3 / IEEE 1815 (outstation link status, Class 0/1/2/3 integrity poll), and IEC 61850 MMS (IED logical-device directory, model browse, data-attribute reads) — plus the base cross-protocol brain (dataflow diagnosis, alarm bad-actors, data-quality scorecards, OEE, asset inventory, compliance self-assessment) mounted on the same server. Use when the task names IEC 60870-5-104 / IEC-104 / 104规约, DNP3 / IEEE 1815 / outstation, IEC 61850 / MMS / IED / GOOSE (GOOSE and Sampled Values are NOT supported — MMS reads only), a substation / 变电站 / RTU / SCADA gateway / telecontrol front-end, energy / power / utility SCADA telemetry, or 遥测遥信 / 电力监控. Routes to the iaiops-energy MCP server. Monitor-only by design: no control/operate (CROB, setpoints, select-before-operate, IEC-104 command ASDUs) is exposed. Do NOT use for factory/building/process protocols (OPC-UA, Modbus, S7, BACnet, MQTT …) — those live in the base iaiops server — nor for IT/network gear, Kubernetes, hypervisors, or backups." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zw008 · publishing for 181 daysInstalls 1,281Last detonated 10 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 234 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,469 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zw008: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zw008Propose a patch to the maintainer