huo15-openclaw-design-critique@2.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "6 维度设计评审（美学 / 可用性 / 品牌一致 / 内容 / 技术实现 / 时代感）+ 审美档位识别（AI-Slop / Junior / Senior / Master 四档）+ 年代识别（命中过时视觉信号自动扣分）+ Master 级对标参考库（每流派 2-3 个真实标杆）+ Keep/Fix/Quick..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-14 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 354 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaobod1: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.