Skills/ClawHub/huo15-codex-juxingyi-setup

huo15-codex-juxingyi-setup@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "安装 Codex 桌面版/CLI 并接入聚星逸网关，配置 Agent 感知 Codex 工作状态。三步：install → configure → perceive。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaobod1 · publishing for 167 daysInstalls 436Last detonated 5d ago
$clawhub install huo15-codex-juxingyi-setup
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Install scripts ran; no agent task scenario for this bundle.
Tested
install scripts, with decoy credentials in place · second launch with the clock 45 days ahead · every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (2 scenarios; install scripts ran; no agent task scenario for this bundle) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 2 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessexited 1:
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocesssecond launch, clock +45 days, CI unset
0.0sprocessexited 1:

Static findings

No findings across 907 lines in 9 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈817 tok
1 file · 9 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.