humor@1.0.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Calibrates when and how an agent uses humor: wit, jokes, banter, and playful tone matched to each user, context, and platform. Use when adding humor or personality to replies, deciding if a joke is appropriate, mirroring or building on a user's joke, punching up a toast, caption, or message on request, recovering after a joke falls flat or draws silence, joking in group chats or across languages, or when the user says be funnier, lighten up, or tone it down." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 72/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 897 lines in 14 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
8 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ivangdavila: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.