human-in-loop-review@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "给自主智能体/自动化流水线加一层「人类在环审核」：把中高危、不可逆、外发隐私、提权、支付等 有副作用的动作路由到人工审核队列，阻止无人值守 agent 越权执行。内置审核分级（needs_review）、 审核队列（add/pending/approve/reject/summary）、完整审计（提议者/风险/审核人/结论/理由/时间戳）。 与 safety-guardrails 互补：护栏做 ALLOW/CONFIRM/DENY 决策，本技能把 CONFIRM 类动作转人工队列。 触发词：人类在环、人工审核、审核队列、审批流、human-in-the-loop、操作确认、越权拦截、agent 审核。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
assert needs_review("rm -rf /data") is TrueFix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.No other findings across 533 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.