hugmap-tech-graph@1.0.1
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "查询 HugMap 科技知识图谱的开放数据，覆盖科技人物、公司/机构、技术、产品、论文、专利、技术文章、科技事件 8 类实体及其关系。支持关键词搜索、实体详情、相似实体推荐、行业聚合、子图/邻居、关系路径、分类体系浏览与全局统计。查询结果会附带各实体在 HugMap 官网（www.hugmap.com）的页面链接..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 995 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim jones-so: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.