huawei-cloud-dws-list@1.0.2
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "1. List Huawei Cloud DWS (Data Warehouse Service / GaussDB(DWS)) clusters in a tenant region through KooCLI (hcloud DWS ListClusters — read-only GET /v1.0/{project_id}/clusters), with an automatic fallback to the official huaweicloudsdkdws v2 SDK when hcloud is not installed. 2. Three output modes: full-field table (default, every returned field including 名称/ID/状态/版本/规格/节点数/可用区/连接信息), --json (raw response array), and --names-only (compact cluster-name list). 3. Supports --name / --status / --cluster-id filtering, --limit / --offset pagination, region override, and the real --enterprise-project-id API parameter. --name / --status / --cluster-id / --limit / --offset are applied client-side (the real ListClusters API exposes only enterprise_project_id). 4. Explicit error hints for empty cluster lists (「当前区域无 DWS 集群」), 403 / insufficient IAM permission (「无权限访问 DWS,请检查 IAM 权限」), missing or invalid AK/SK credentials, and hcloud not installed. 5. Built-in write-intent guard: any mutating intent (create / delete / update / resize / restart / stop / restore / upgrade / reboot) or any operation other than ListClusters is rejected before execution — this skill is strictly read-only. 6. Triggers include: "list DWS clusters", "DWS cluster list", "DWS 集群列表", "查询DWS集群", "数据仓库集群列表", "GaussDB(DWS) 列表", "DWS inventory", "list data warehouse clusters", "华为云DWS集群". 7. Offline unit tests (mocked hcloud subprocess) cover output modes, filters, pagination, error scenarios, SDK fallback, and the write-intent guard." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-28 and scored it 66/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 1,688 lines in 9 files.
What would make this Verified
14 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wlc-dev: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.