Skills/ClawHub/huawei-cloud-apig-instance-list

huawei-cloud-apig-instance-list@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "1. List Huawei Cloud APIG dedicated instances in a tenant region through KooCLI (hcloud APIG ListInstancesV2 — read-only GET /v2/{project_id}/apigw/instances), with an automatic fallback to the official huaweicloudsdkapig v2 SDK when hcloud is not installed. 2. Drill down into one instance's API inventory with --instance-id (hcloud APIG ListApisV2 — read-only GET /v2/{project_id}/apigw/instances/{instance_id}/apis); an unknown instance id is reported explicitly with a non-zero exit code. 3. Three output modes: compact list (default — instance name / id / status), --table (实例ID/名称/状态/规格/版本/可用区/EIP/VPC/创建时间), and --json (raw response records). 4. Client-side filters --name (--fuzzy for substring match), --instance-id and --status; --region override (default cn-north-4); --limit 1-100 with automatic offset/limit paging. 5. Explicit error hints for empty instance lists, 403 / insufficient IAM permission, missing or invalid AK/SK credentials, [USE_ERROR] parameter errors, and a non-existent instance id. 6. Built-in write-intent guard: any mutating intent (create / delete / update / publish / offline / bind-eip / unbind-eip / ...) is rejected before execution — this skill is strictly read-only. 7. Triggers include: "list APIG instances", "APIG 实例列表", "查询APIG实例", "APIG 专享版实例", "apig instance inventory", "查询实例API列表", "APIG API 列表", "apig gateway list"." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher wlc-dev · joined 14 days agoInstalls 0Last detonated 3 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-05 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
Python subprocess execution detectedscripts/list_apig_instances.py:349 · Python subprocess execution detectedFix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
AST05

No other findings across 2,226 lines in 10 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈4,126 tok
1 file · 10 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wlc-dev: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim wlc-dev