Skills/ClawHub/hr-talk-compass

hr-talk-compass@1.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "HR 员工谈心与 OD 洞察助手。基于斯坦福《人生设计课》设计思维框架，帮助 HR 准备员工一对一、演练关键对话、赋能业务经理，并将谈后复盘沉淀为组织诊断信号。当用户提到员工谈心、一对一沟通、保留面谈、离职预警、职业规划对话、OD、组织诊断、员工敬业度时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher realzjr · publishing for 106 daysInstalls 703Last detonated 4d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,223 lines in 16 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈926 tok
1 file · 16 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim realzjr: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim realzjrPropose a patch to the maintainer