Skills/ClawHub/hot-topic-content-maker

hot-topic-content-maker@0.3.6

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Turn a trending topic into a post you can publish today. Bring the hot topic, moment, or seasonal peg — or have it read the public trending boards on Douyin, TikTok, and X, or name a topic and have it search what people are actually posting about it on Xiaohongshu and Douyin, and pick the ones worth a look. This trending content workflow finds the angles that genuinely connect the topic to your brand or account, judges which one is worth your name on it, then builds the chosen angle into a finished post: cover wording and a rendered cover image, the caption, the hashtags, a beat-by-beat plan for a short cut, and the narrated vertical clip itself. Use it for trendjacking, newsjacking, trend-riding, trend discovery, seasonal and holiday campaigns, festival and shopping-event content, moment marketing, and getting a same-day social post or short video out of a topic while it is still moving. The finished post fits Douyin, Xiaohongshu, WeChat Channels, TikTok, Reels, and Shorts." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher beatra-ai · publishing for 86 daysInstalls 973Last detonated 2d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagescripts/mcp_client.py:1022 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codereturn None if source is None else {"source": source, "command": f"npx skills update {slug} -g -y"}Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06
MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packagescripts/mcp_client.py:1014 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code"command": f"npx skills update {slug} -p -y (run in {_shell_quote(str(directory))})",Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈5,076 tok
1 file · 21 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim beatra-ai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim beatra-aiPropose a patch to the maintainer