Skills/ClawHub/hf-daily-researcher-v2

hf-daily-researcher-v2@4.1.4

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "HuggingFace Daily Papers + arXiv 多Agent深度研究系统。 采用编排器+专业Agent架构,支持两种模式: 1. 轻量扫描模式:周期性追踪(周/月),发现新论文 2. 深度调研模式:全时间范围调研,产出全面深入的研究报告 支持动态配置、自适应关键词、周期版本控制、跨平台搜索工具适配。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher tomfoxxxx · publishing for 130 daysInstalls 444Last detonated 3d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 5,418 lines in 30 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈4,886 tok
1 file · 30 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tomfoxxxx: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim tomfoxxxxPropose a patch to the maintainer