hf-daily-researcher-min@4.1.4
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "HuggingFace Daily Papers + arXiv 多Agent深度研究系统。 采用编排器+专业Agent架构,支持两种模式: 1. 轻量扫描模式:周期性追踪(周/月),发现新论文 2. 深度调研模式:全时间范围调研,产出全面深入的研究报告 支持动态配置、自适应关键词、周期版本控制、跨平台搜索工具适配。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 675 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tomfoxxxx: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.