gzh-content-growth-analyzer@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "【公众号运营优化（火焰）】火焰广告传媒出品。输入任意公众号文章（URL或全文），八维度爆款诊断：标题吸引力/开篇留存力/内容价值密度/情绪设计/结构节奏感/传播触发器/互动引导力/视觉与排版，输出0-100爆款潜力评分、火/不火归因分析、可借鉴亮点提炼、逐维度优化改法和运营增长策略。写完文章发来即诊，同行爆款发来拆解，持续提升公众号数据表现。触发词：公众号分析、文章分析、为什么火、为什么不火、爆款拆解、文章诊断、公众号优化、内容增长、运营优化。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,741 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim frankchenfei: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.