Skills/ClawHub/guaikei-video-wenzi-fetcher

guaikei-video-wenzi-fetcher@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "视频转文字 + 文案产出二合一。用户丢来一个视频（链接或本地文件）要求转写、总结、提取文案、改写二创时使用。基于云端大模型完成语音转写与语义理解，自动过滤口误与冗余，按需输出完整文字稿或指定风格的成品文案。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher engheng-art · publishing for 99 daysInstalls 310Last detonated 7d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 2,527 lines in 17 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,720 tok
1 file · 17 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim engheng-art: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim engheng-artPropose a patch to the maintainer