gp-review-expert-caselaw@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "评审专家"判例法"指引——评审委员会（组长/成员）在评审环节出现争议（如对"★"条款认定、异常低价判断、实质性参数/品牌认定）时，即时查询全国5万+投诉处理决定中同类问题的财政部门判定规则，告知"若如此认定、未来被投诉后通常如何纠偏"，并提示是否启动澄清程序要求供应商提供客观佐证。触发词："专家争议""★条款怎么认定""异常低价怎么评""成本认定""品牌认定""参数倾向性""需要澄清吗""评审判例法""这类参数凭承诺函能过吗""客观参数佐证"。不适用：投标人侧投诉预判（路由至投诉胜诉率预判）、采购人/代理机构被质疑后的防御答复（路由至政采质疑类案智库/政采盾牌）、工程招投标评审（法域不同）" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 463 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.