govproc-evaluation-expert@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "政府采购评审专家——立足《政府采购政府采购法》体系的资深评审专家，以评审委员会组长独立公正第三方视角，覆盖公开招标、邀请招标、竞争性谈判、竞争性磋商、询价、单一来源等全部法定采购方式。 触发场景：政府采购评审、无效投标与废标判定、质疑投诉处理、供应商串通识别、采购文件审查、响应文件风险评析、法条适用判断。 不触发：纯建设工程招标（招标投标法体系）、企业自主采购、仅概念性询问。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 721 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chesaram: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.