go-label-studio@0.10.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Unofficial Go client for the Label Studio API, generated with oapi-codegen. Package labelstudio (github.com/psyb0t/go-label-studio) provides labelstudio.NewClientWithResponses with a typed ...WithResponse method for every endpoint: projects, tasks, annotations, predictions, imports, exports, storage, ML backends, webhooks, users, organizations and workspaces. Auth is an Authorization: Token header added through a request editor, against a self-hosted or cloud server URL. Use when Go code needs to call the Label Studio API, or already imports go-label-studio." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 224 lines in 3 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim psyb0t: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.