Skills/ClawHub/game-theory-tool-free

game-theory-tool-free@1.0.2

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "策略互动分析工具,支持纳什均衡、囚徒困境与决策树分析。Use when 需要数据分析、报表生成、统计洞察、数据可视化时使用。不适用于实时流数据处理。适用于独立开发者、企业团队和自动化工作流场景。支持中文交互，无需复杂配置即开即用。输出结果可直接使用，减少二次加工成本。提供结构化输出和错误处理机制。支持多场景应用和灵活配置。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher thcjp · joined 6 days agoInstalls 756Last detonated 45 min ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-05 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 521 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,603 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim thcjp: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim thcjp