Skills/ClawHub/fund-cio-copilot

fund-cio-copilot@2.6.2

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "产业基金 CIO Copilot —— 面向产业基金 GP / 投资总监 / 投委会的投资决策辅助 Agent。覆盖 Screening（BP 初筛）→ Evaluation（立项分析）→ IC（投委会）→ Portfolio（投后管理/生命周期闭环）→ Radar（地方国资投资周报/产业雷达）全流程，内置五层分析引擎、Decision Memory 机构记忆与四件套对象族（Decision/Monitoring/Outcome/Learning）。辅助决策，不做投资决定。触发词：筛 BP / 初筛 / 立项分析 / 投委 / IC / 上会 / 投后 / 跟踪 / 里程碑 / 复盘 / 基金决策 / 产业基金 / 周报 / 产业雷达。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher perrykono-debug · joined 1 days agoInstalls 334Last detonated 9 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 1,804 lines in 14 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈4,337 tok
1 file · 14 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim perrykono-debug: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim perrykono-debugPropose a patch to the maintainer