Skills/ClawHub/food-store-location

food-store-location@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "选址失误的代价极高，但很多人只看租金和面积，忽略人流方向、可见度、上下水、电力容量和证照条件。 输入：业态（快餐/正餐/饮品/小吃）、候选铺位信息、租金与面积、周边环境描述、预算与目标回本周期。输出：①选址评估表（可见度/人流方向/停留时长/竞品密度/交通/配套，逐项打分）②硬件条件核查（上下水/电力容量/排烟/燃气/层高）③证照与物业条件（能否办证、是否允许明火）④成本测算框架（租金占比警戒线）⑤谈判要点（免租期/递增/转让费）⑥实地考察必须做的 5 个动作（不同时段蹲点）。永久免费，无需付费、无需授权（MIT-0）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher sxq0607 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 222Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 148 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sxq0607: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim sxq0607