Skills/ClawHub/food-menu-pricing

food-menu-pricing@1.0.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "定价凭感觉容易两头亏：定低了没毛利、定高了没人点；菜单结构不做主推，顾客永远只点最便宜的。 输入：菜品清单与成本（主料/辅料/人工分摊）、客单价目标、门店类型与客群、竞品价格区间、爆品/利润品。输出：①单品成本与建议售价（按目标毛利率倒推，给区间）②菜单结构设计（引流款/利润款/形象款配比与位置）③套餐组合与搭配逻辑 ④菜单文案与命名建议（含心理定价）⑤调价与上新节奏 ⑥毛利健康度自检表。永久免费，无需付费、无需授权（MIT-0）。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher sxq0607 · joined 5 days agoInstalls 224Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 144 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim sxq0607: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim sxq0607