Skills/ClawHub/food-inspection-guard

food-inspection-guard@1.0.1

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "食品安全抽检检测合规护栏。在食品安全监督抽检报告、食品检验报告、食品快检结果发布前,实时检测是否符合《食品安全法》《食品安全抽样检验管理办法》及GB 2760/GB 2761/GB 2762等食品安全国家标准要求,拦截不合规内容并给出修改建议。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher 1003429073 · publishing for 93 daysInstalls 619Last detonated 19 h ago
$clawhub install food-inspection-guard
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 181 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈576 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

food-inspection-guard@1.0.1 safety verdict: Verified (install only) — KillerSkills