food-drug-cosmetics-ad-guard@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "食药化妆品广告合规护栏。在药品 / 医疗器械 / 保健食品 / 特殊医学用途配方食品 / 化妆品 的广告文案、产品详情、直播话术、对外宣传发布前，实时拦截功效断言保证、治愈率有效率、疾病治疗宣称、处方药违规发布、医疗作用暗示、绝对化用语等 6 类高频违法违规表述，按风险分级给出整改建议。纯本地运行，零网络、零动态执行。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 512 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wwumit: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.